Search for: "C. Walker" Results 1 - 20 of 1,390
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2010, 2:44 pm by scanner1
WALKER and RANA RAE WALKER, Respondents and Appellees. ______________________________________________ WALLACE C. [read post]
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA – CIRCA 2000: A stamp printed in USA shows Madam C J Charles Joseph Walker Sarah Breedlove (1867-1919), entrepreneur, Self Adhesive, Black Heritage Series, circa 2000 Madam C.J. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 10:57 am by Yosi Yahoudai
(c) Subdivision (b) shall not apply in any case where the victim of the bite or bites was not a party to, nor a participant in, nor suspected to be a party to or a participant in, the act or acts that prompted the use of the dog in the military or police work. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:46 am
Men prefer Walker by a 58% to 40% margin, while women favor Barrett 50% to 43%....IN THE COMMENTS: jeffmacguy asks: [C]an someone with some Wisconsin insight please tell me how these people are going to react when Walker wins big? [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 11:21 am by kkaiser
f=/c/a/2010/08/07/INO61EFPES.DTL In reading Walker’s opinion, which carefully and quite compellingly dissected the arguments of each side, it is apparent that a judge known for his diligence went to great lengths to put it on display in this case…. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 2:01 am by sally
Regina v H (J); Same v Ferris; Same v W (A); Same v Walker; Same v Dan; Same v S (C); Same v Robertson; Same v P (M) [2011] EWCA Crim 2753; [2012] WLR (D) 12 “In principle, in historic or cold cases, a defendant had to be sentenced in accordance with the sentencing regime applicable at the date of sentence. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 1:04 am
Walker argued that 924(c)'s mandate of consecutive 25-year sentences conflicts with the parsimony clause in 18 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 8:37 am by Elizabeth Howell
The Court of Appeals held that KRS 405.021(1)(b) and (c) were constitutional, distinguishing them from the statutes at issue in Troxel and Walker. [read post]
29 May 2009, 6:00 am
Cal. 2007) ("damages" insufficient to confer Prop. 64 standing) with G&C Auto Body Inc. v. [read post]